Free Consultation: (650) 345-8484 Tap Here to Call Us

A Law Firm You Can Trust.

Contact Us for a Free Consultation

A Law Firm You Can Trust.

Northern California Rear-End Accident Results in $2.9M Damages Award for Injured Plaintiff

A jury in Sacramento recently awarded an injured plaintiff nearly $2.9 million in damages for the injuries the plaintiff suffered in a serious rear-end accident (Case 34-2013-00149232-CU-PA-GDS). The plaintiff’s evidence was enough to convince the jury that the harm from the accident had caused numerous serious injuries and forever altered the life of the very active 26-year-old plaintiff.

 

The plaintiff in this case was a physically active dog groomer and trainer who was stopped in heavy traffic in Sacramento. While she was stopped, a man in a Ford F-250 pickup truck rear-ended her vehicle. The truck was hauling two tons of equipment on a trailer behind it. The impact caused the woman to suffer a wide array of injuries, including to her teeth, face, neck, shoulders, back, hips, and knees. The woman sued the truck’s driver, and, since the man was in the course of performing his job when the accident occurred, she also sued his employer.

Even though the woman did not, as part of her lawsuit, present claims for loss of future wages or loss of future earning capacity, she still contended that the harm she’d suffered was major. The plaintiff’s dental/facial treatment included two bone grafts on her lower jaw, followed by dental implant surgery. Later, the plaintiff’s doctors implanted a permanent five-tooth prosthetic bridge.

Her case also contended that she’d need future pain management therapy in the form of epidural treatments and would also, at some point in the future, need spinal fusion therapy. Allegedly, the accident also prevented her from returning to the pre-accident lifestyle that she had led. Before the accident, the woman engaged in trail-running, hiking, and weightlifting, but allegedly she could not participate in those activities because of her injuries.

The truck driver was 100% at fault, and the accident caused all of her injuries, according to the woman. The defendants took issue with the latter half of this assertion. They argued that, while the accident caused the harm the woman suffered to her face and teeth, the harm to the woman’s back was unrelated to the accident. In support of this position, the defense pointed out that none of the woman’s medical care providers, from the emergency responders at the accident to the woman’s primary doctors, documented any problems or complaints related to the woman’s lower back area until six weeks after the accident.

As also happens with some injury cases, the plaintiff faced a defense that was able to go to considerable lengths to oppose the plaintiff’s case. In this case, the defense surveilled the plaintiff, racking up more than 60 hours of video footage. The defense introduced at trial a video showing the woman working out on an elliptical trainer.

In the end, though, the jury was persuaded by the plaintiff’s case and entered a verdict in favor of her. The total damages awarded amounted to almost $2.9 million. The largest components of this award were the woman’s future medical care ($900,000) and future pain and suffering ($1.75 million).

In a case in which you are hit by a truck, the harm that the crash inflicts upon you can be substantial. That’s why you need experienced counsel on your side to help you present your case and successfully prove all of your damages. The skilled and knowledgeable San Mateo truck accident attorneys at the Law Offices of Galine, Frye, Fitting & Frangos have been representing injured people in California for many years and have the experience and abilities to help you. To set up a free consultation with one of our attorneys, contact us at 650-345-8484 or through our website.

More Blog Posts:

California Trucker’s $241K Jury Verdict Survives Defense Claim of Juror Misconduct, San Mateo Injury Lawyers Blog, published Feb. 3, 2017

Unfair Surprises at Trial and Your California Truck Accident Case, San Mateo Injury Lawyers Blog, published Aug. 19, 2016

Truck Accident

Client Reviews

    I retained Ilya Frangos of Galine, Frye, Fitting & Frangos on a business litigation matter involving a frivolous lawsuit filed in federal court. Ilya guided me through the case and helped make sure that I understood the process… He always took the time to answer all my questions and helped put my mind at ease. I would highly recommend him and this firm!

    Agatha

    I called Mr Frye after my wife had passed away… John listened to my case over the phone, after aggreeing to represent me, handled everything from there… I have already recommended Mr Frye to a friend for help with a similiar case and would without reserve recommend him to anybody. He came highly recommended as an expert in these type cases, and I believe he demonstrated this personally.

    Jerry

    Chantel Fitting is as good as it gets. If you have been injured, need help and cant get what you know you deserve from one of the big insurance companies, then you have got to call Chantel. She will fight for you like it was her that was hurt… She cares. Call her. You wont be sorry you did.

    Cindy C.

    A great experience. Excellent law firm which treats their client’s with the utmost respect. Very knowledgeable and made me fell extremely secure when handling my personal injury claim. Would highly recommend Galine, Frye, Fitting & Frangos to handle your next case.

    Lisa D.

    I was fortunate enough to have been represented and retained by this law firm for my injuries sustained by an under insured motorist. I must say Chantel Fitting and Illya Frangos went above and beyond trying to resolve my case… I would highly recommend this law firm and stop shopping around if you are looking for the best, as this is as good as it gets.

    Joanna K.

Submit a Law Firm Client Review